The US healthcare system is experiencing decreased investment and support for primary care, as revealed in the first-of-its-kind primary care "scorecard" study.
The findings suggest a dearth of funding, a shrinking workforce, discrepancies in healthcare accessibility, and a lack of government support for research in primary care.
Recommended measures for ensuring high-quality primary care include comprehensive training for healthcare teams, implementation of digital health records, and increased funding.
Primary healthcare is the backbone of a nation’s healthcare system. It positively affects the health of the population and helps to reduce health disparities. In the US, however, primary care is struggling.
Fewer physicians are entering primary care practice, leaving many areas underserved, and support is lacking for a wide range of health needs that primary care could address.
Trends in primary care
To gain a better understanding of the state of primary care in the US, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) conducted a study to analyze the trends. They focused on five major areas: financing, workforce, access, training, and research. Their report yielded dismaying results. The “scorecard,” the first of its kind, is a baseline for future evaluations—and a wake-up call to the nation to make a stronger investment in primary care.
Origin of the report
The NASEM scorecard study was a response to the call to action outlined in an earlier NASEM report, which advocated establishing high-quality primary care services in the US and a scorecard for measurement.
The authors commented on the need for these actions:
"This weakening of primary care comes at a time when the country needs it more than ever."
— Authors, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM)
The NASEM describes high-quality primary care as "the provision of whole-person, integrated, accessible, and equitable health care by interprofessional teams that are accountable for addressing the majority of an individual's health and wellness needs across settings and through sustained relationships with patients, families, and communities."
The NASEM study was supported by the Physicians Foundation and the Milbank Memorial Fund, with study contributions from the Robert Graham Center, a research component of the American Academy of Family Physicians.
The primary care scorecard
The scorecard revealed the following:
Funding: Primary care in the United States is consistently underfunded. Funding fell to 4.6% in 2020 from 6.2% in 2013—with a decline in Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial investments. To put this into perspective, the average investment in primary care is nearly 8% of total healthcare spending among the 38 industrialized nations of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Workforce: One-third of US doctors are primary care physicians, but only 21% of those who completed their residency between 2012 and 2020 were still practicing primary care 2 years later.
Access: The number of adults who lack a regular source of care is on the rise. Over 27% of Americans didn't have a primary care provider in 2020, compared with 23.6% in 2010.
Training: Community-based training of physicians varies significantly between states. In some, all physicians are trained in rural or medically underserved areas, whereas in others, less than 6% of physician residents are trained in community settings—where most primary care takes place.
Research: Funding for primary care research at the federal level is virtually nonexistent. Primary care only gets 0.2% of funding from the National Institutes of Health.
The findings indicate a dearth of funding, a decreasing workforce, discrepancies in healthcare accessibility, and a significant lack of government funding for research in the primary care domain.
President of the Milbank Memorial Fund, Christopher Koller, commented on the report in a press release:
"Our healthcare system is wildly out of balance and in critical need of reform."
— Christopher Koller, President, Milbank Memorial Fund
The NASEM report acknowledges that the US spends more per capita on healthcare than any other developed nation, yet has the worst health outcomes.
This sobering reality highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive healthcare system overhaul, focusing on strengthening primary care services.
Roadmap for reform
To improve high-quality primary care, the NASEM report suggests several measures:
Ensure access: Require all covered individuals to name their usual source of primary care to their payers, and assign a source of care to those who don’t identify one. The report also calls for creating new health centers in underprivileged areas.
Reform payment: Boost funding for primary care, and employ hybrid payment methods that combine elements of both fee-for-service and capitation.
Train primary care teams: Expand and diversify the primary care workforce through initiatives developed with healthcare organizations and government agencies.
Verify implementation: Establish a permanent Office of Primary Care Research under the National Institutes of Health, and a Secretary's Council on Primary Care, to foster research and enhance primary care access.
Continue innovative educational programs: Continue the support of alternative training and funding models for graduate medical education, like the Teaching Health Center, which provides community-based training and encourages practice in underserved and rural areas.
What this means for you
The primary care scorecard from the NASEM revealed some stark deficiencies in our nation’s system of primary care. Now that there is a baseline for moving forward, healthcare professionals can partner with policymakers and take proactive measures to improve the delivery of patient-centered services. The roadmap to do so, as outlined in the NASEM report, shows the areas most in need for future investments. These measures will help to establish a solid foundation for high-quality primary care in the US.