Is obesity grounds for visa denial? New US directive sparks ethical debate
Industry Buzz
What BMI cutoff would we use for obesity? And is there any cutoff that will not be arbitrary to a person’s value as a citizen? Would this policy cause people seeking citizenship to downplay their medical illness back home? Would this lack of disclosure result in them being more sick?
—Dr. Smith, endocrinologist*
A directive circulated on November 6, 2025, by the US State Department instructs embassies and consulates to consider chronic conditions, such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and certain mental health conditions, when assessing visa applicants under the “public charge” rule.[]
For foreign physicians whose patients may seek entry to the US, the shift has significant implications.
Closer to home, U.S.-based doctors may also feel the effects, as many of the chronic conditions listed are common among immigrant patients already residing in the United States—patients who may be pursuing visas, green cards, or future citizenship. This directive could influence how these individuals engage with the healthcare system, disclose diagnoses, or seek documentation, potentially placing clinicians in a more complex advisory role.
What the directive says
The cable states that “Certain medical conditions — including, but not limited to, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, and mental health conditions — can require hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of care.”
There is a focus on “public charge,” a rule that denies visas and green cards to individuals expected to rely on social welfare programs or be institutionalized.[] Notably, the guidance pays special attention to obesity, citing its association with asthma, sleep apnea, and high blood pressure.[]
What your peers are saying
While formal peer-reviewed commentaries remain limited—given how recent this change is— several physicians and health policy observers have voiced concern:
Marc Siegel, MD, a senior medical analyst for Fox News, noted, "The idea behind this is that obesity is connected directly to other costly chronic health problems including type 2 diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke, high cholesterol and mostly inflammation in the body."[]
In an interview with a local news outlet, Yvel Moreau, MD, stated, “You’ve got to give people a chance, that is what this country is built on. Giving people a fair opportunity to make a living, to support their families, and to contribute. Pay taxes like most people do. I think targeting people that way is not right.”[]
“On a philosophical level,” Dr. Smith (*name changed for anonymity), an endocrinologist, tells MDLinx, “I do believe that all people are made in the likeness of a good creator and have intrinsic worth and value regardless of their medical comorbidities … However, there are several concerns with expanding the criteria to include chronic illnesses … Expanding criteria to restrict chronic conditions may be excessively discriminatory … Many people live with chronic illnesses that strengthen them in character and maturity and allow them to be better citizens.”
While the policy does not specify fixed cutoffs, it flags the applicant’s risk of requiring long-term institutional care or becoming dependent on public assistance.[]
Dr. Smith* adds, “What body mass index (BMI) cutoff would we use for obesity? And is there any cutoff that will not be arbitrary to a person’s value as a citizen? Would this policy cause people seeking citizenship to downplay their medical illness back home? Would this lack of disclosure result in them being more sick?”
The directive marks a notable departure in US visa health screening policy, moving from a focus on infectious diseases and vaccination status toward a broader evaluation of chronic disease burden and potential healthcare costs. For physicians, this could result in more stringent documentation, patient counseling, and intersection between medicine and immigration policy.
Read Next: '[This] is stigmatizing and ethically troubling': Guidance for clinicians when health status shapes immigration decisions