Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials 3. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 4. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 5. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer
Your Article Summary
Comparison of clinical risk scores predicting prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases
Journal of Surgical Oncology, 07/07/09
Merkel S et al. - In a study to compare the risk scores of Fong et al., Nordlinger et al., and the TNM classification of colorectal liver metastases proposed by the UICC, the study found the clinical risk score developed by Fong et al. to be a reliable preoperative prognostic tool for selecting pts for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Methods- Data from 282 consecutive pts undergoing 303 liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer at the Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen were analyzed.
- Median follow-up time was 34 mos.
- A curative (R0) resection was performed in 92% of the pts.
- Applying the clinical risk score of Fong with preoperative data identified 3 risk groups.
- Survival rates between low risk (n=22) and intermediate risk (n=222) diverged.
- Survival rates between intermediate risk and high risk (n=59) differed significantly.
- Using the risk scoring system of Nordlinger, pts were divided into 2 risk groups, ie, low risk (n=218) and intermediate risk (n=68).
- Significant differences in survival between the groups were noted.
- Applying clinical TNM classification of colorectal liver metastases revealed no significant differences in survival between risk groups.
Today in Colo-Rectal...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Localized resection for colon cancer
Surgical Oncology, 11/04/09
Quality of surgery for rectal carcinoma: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches
The American Journal of Surgery, 11/03/09
Colorectal Cancer Risk Reduction After Polypectomy: Evidence Against the National Polyp Study
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology , 11/05/09
Today in Hepatobiliary/Pancreas...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Novel Pancreaticojejunostomy with a Low Rate of Anastomotic Failure-Related Complications
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 10/30/09
Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible
Irish Journal of Medical Science, 11/02/09
Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: A RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis
Surgical Endoscopy, 11/19/09
Today in Surgical Oncology...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Localized resection for colon cancer
Surgical Oncology, 11/04/09
Quality of surgery for rectal carcinoma: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches
The American Journal of Surgery, 11/03/09
Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis : The Lancet Oncology
The Lancet Oncology - Online First, 10/23/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


