mdlinx mdlinx

MDLinx E-mail Article

To email this article, enter your own "From Email" address, the recipient's "To Email" address, and click the "Send Email" button. You may send to up to 5 emails at a time.


* From Email: 
* To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
Email Subject Line: 
Comments:

The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Open Surgery in Clinically Suspected T4 Colorectal Cancer

Huh JW et al. – Laparoscopic colorectal resection for T4 colorectal cancer is feasible and has perioperative and short–term oncologic outcomes similar to those of an open approach. However, further studies with long–term follow–up are needed to resolve these issues.

Methods
  • Forty–three consecutive patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer with suspected involvement of another organ (T4) by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed.
  • Twenty–four patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection were matched with 19 patients who underwent an open approach.
  • All available clinicopathologic variables possibly associated with the outcome were compared.

Results
  • Two patients (8.3%) who underwent the laparoscopic procedure were converted to the open technique.
  • Patients in the open group displayed more advanced pathologic T category (P=.008) and underwent more combined operation than patients in the laparoscopic group (P=.017).
  • The R0 resection rate was 75% in the laparoscopic group and 52.6% in the open group (P=.135).
  • Patients in the laparoscopic group displayed a tendency for lower estimated blood loss (P=.083), sooner bowel movement (P=.075), and shorter length of hospital stay (P=.089) than patients in the open group.
  • No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the laparoscopic and open groups (20.8% versus 36.8%, P=.246).
  • After a median follow–up of 27 months, the 3–year disease–free survival rate in the laparoscopic group was found to be not significantly different from that in the open group (76.7% versus 58.8%; P=.303).
[more...]

Register now to view all the MDLinx contents (FREE)!

  • Stay current on the latest literature, research and clinical news
  • Get special communications and offers from MDLinx and our sponsors
  • Receive invitations to paid market research
View Samples and Register

Stay current - Media Tool

Newsletter
RSS
Follow Us
Facebook

Receive free subspecialty
"5-minute updates" via email

Sign up!

Send the E-mail Newsletter to a Colleague


Send

Subscribe to our free RSS feeds:
Get the latest news in your specialty automatically added to your newsreader or your personal My Yahoo!, Google, My MSN or My AOL page. Learn More

Follow Us on Twitter
Twitter is a rich source of instantly updated information. Join today and follow @MDLinx to start receiving tweets. Learn More

Close