Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Rapid correction of low vitamin D status in nursing home residents 3. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 4. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors 5. Allopurinol-induced recurrent dress syndrome: Pathophysiology and treatment
Top Ten Searches
rheumatoid arthritis lupus polymyalgia sjogrens fibromyalgia amyloidosis vasculitis urate raynauds myositisYour Article Summary
Development and validation of the self-administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status: A disease-specific composite measure for evaluating treatment effect
Arthritis Research & Therapy, 08/24/09
Salaffi F et al. – Study reports that the self–administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS) is a reliable, valid and responsive disease–specific composite measure for assessing treatment effect in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).
Methods- Aim was to develop and analyse the psychometric properties of a new composite disease–specific index, FAS
- FAS combines a pt's assessment of fatigue, sleep disturbances and pain evaluated on the basis of 16 non–articular sites list of the SAPS in a single measure (range 0 to 10)
- FAS index was constructed using a traditional development strategy
- Its psychometric properties were tested in 226 FM pts (209 women)
- Pt’s disease–related characteristics were assessed by:
- 11–numbered circular numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances and general health (GH)
- Tender point score (TPS)
- SAPS, FIQ, and SF–36
- 226 RA pts were used for comparative purposes
- 152 of 179 FM pts completed the 3–mo period and were included in the responsiveness analyses
- 154 pts repeated the FAS questionnaire after an interval of 1 wk; its test/re–test reliability was calculated
- Responsiveness was evaluated on the basis of effect size and the standardised response mean
- FAS index fulfilled the established criteria for validity, reliability and responsiveness
- Factor analysis showed that SAPS and fatigue contributed most, and respectively explained 47.4% and 31.2% of the variance; sleep explained 21.3%
- A closer significant correlations were found when FAS was compared with total FIQ, and the FIQ subscales, particularly job ability, tiredness, fatigue and pain
- But the correlation between FAS and the mental component summary scale score (MCS) of the SF–36 was particularly interesting
- Test/re–test reliability was satisfactory
- FAS showed the greatest effect size
- The magnitude of the responsiveness measures was different between FAS and the FIQ, and between the SF–36 MCS and the SF–36 physical component summary scale score (PCS)
Today in Chr Fatigue/Fibromyalgia...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Advances in fibromyalgia treatment: understanding endogenous pain modulation
International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 11/09/09
Pain and rheumatology: An overview of the problem
European Journal of Pain, 11/17/09
Is fatigue an inflammatory variable in rheumatoid arthritis (ra)? analyses of fatigue in ra, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia
Journal of Rheumatology, 11/19/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


