Boocock MG et al. – A systematic approach to the classification and diagnosis of work-related upper extremity (UE) conditions is likely to lead to more precise estimates of the prevalence and cost of UE conditions, as well as the information on the efficacy of medical and workplace interventions. Methods
The purpose of this study was to identify internationally applied terminology and definitions appropriate to work-related UE conditions
An extensive literature search of 15 electronic databases
Personal communications with representatives from national and international health and safety organizations
Results
Information specific to the umbrella terms and their corresponding conditions was obtained from 15 countries
The findings revealed a lack of international consensus over appropriate terminology
UE conditions could be classified into three broad categories:
(1) 14 “specific conditions” with evidence-based diagnostic criteria
(2) 34 “other specific conditions” with no clearly defined diagnosis
(3) “nonspecific conditions” requiring a clear pattern of signs and symptoms to be present for a diagnosis to be made
A dynamic model for classifying work-related UE conditions is proposed which places greater emphasis on specific diagnosis