Radiology Journals

Radiology

sponsor
Become a Member Today!
Register
Email:


Password:

Remember me
Forgot your Password?
Invite Code?
Article ID

Your Article Summary

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Kim YI et al. – The angles between the ACPC line and both the TS–IOP line and the TS–EOP line were significantly smaller than the angles between the ACPC line and the OML. In actual scanned images, the angle differences between the TS–OPline and the ACPC line were statistically smaller than the angles between the OML and the ACPC line. TS–OP lines are nearly parallel to the ACPC line.

Related Articles

Editor's Summary and Q&A: Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 11/12/09    Relevance Score: 78%

Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 11/11/09    Relevance Score: 78%

On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 10/26/09    Relevance Score: 78%

Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth
Dental Traumatology, 10/19/09    Relevance Score: 78%

Spontaneous Abdominal Hemorrhage: Causes, CT Findings, and Clinical Implications
American Journal of Roentgenology, 10/02/09    Relevance Score: 78%


Sponsor

Article Search

Keyword:

Search:

Published within

Sort By:
Date
Relevance


Sponsor

Send this Summary to a Colleague

Enter email address