Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. AHA Guidelines on Cardiac CT for Assessing Coronary Artery Disease 4. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 5. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors
Your Article Summary
Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms. A Partial Explanation
Journal of Digital Imaging, 02/17/09
Haygood TM et al. - Computer manipulation time partially explains the discrepancy in interaction times between DM and FSM. Radiologists also appear to spend more time looking at DM than at FSM before making a decision.
Related Articles
Mammogram radiation may put some women at risk
Reuters, 12/02/09
Relevance Score: 87%
Task force opposes routine mammograms for women age 40-49
CNN Health, 11/17/09
Relevance Score: 87%
‘If I feel something wrong, then I will get a mammogram’: understanding barriers and facilitators for mammography screening among Chilean women
Family Practice, 11/09/09
Relevance Score: 85%
Costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 11/05/09
Relevance Score: 85%
Mammographic Determination of Breast Volume by Elliptical Cone Estimation
World Journal of Surgery, 12/02/09
Relevance Score: 82%
Today in Mammography...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
The ACR BI-RADS Experience: Learning From History
Journal of the American College of Radiology, 12/03/09
Differentiation between nodules and end-on vessels using a convolution neural network architecture
Journal of Digital Imaging, 12/03/09
Computer-Aided Detection in Digital Mammography: False-Positive Marks and Their Reproducibility in Negative Mammograms
Acta Radiologica, 12/02/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


