Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors 4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System 5. Statins and cancer risk
Your Article Summary
The Impact of Differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D Utility Scores on the Acceptability of Cost–Utility Ratios: Results across Five Trial-Based Cost-Utility Studies
Value in Health, 11/11/09
Joore M et al. – Much of the appeal in using QALYs as measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations is in the comparability across conditions and interventions. The incomparability of the results of cost–utility analyses using different instruments to estimate a single index value for health severely undermines this aspect and reduces the credibility of the use of incremental cost–utility ratios for decision–making.
Related Articles
Hospital prices climb 0.2% in September
American Hospital Association News, 11/03/09
Relevance Score: 67%
Organizational changes at AHA
American Hospital Association News, 11/12/09
Relevance Score: 66%
Higher hospital spending linked to better outcomes
American Medical News, 11/06/09
Relevance Score: 66%
CCHIT Revamping EHR Certification
HealthDataManagement, 10/08/09
Relevance Score: 66%
Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of hospital versus telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer
British Journal of Surgery, 11/17/09
Relevance Score: 65%
Today in Economics of Medicine...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Willingness to Pay for Maternal Health Outcomes: Are Women Willing to Pay More than Men
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 03/01/10
The changing economy may mean a change in plans
Physicians Practice, 02/26/10
The interface between residential aged care and the emergency department: a systematic review
Age and Aging, 02/25/10
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


