Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors 4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System 5. Statins and cancer risk
Your Article Summary
Development of a Self-Report Measure of Fearful Activities for Patients With Low Back Pain: The Fear of Daily Activities Questionnaire
Physical Therapy, 09/02/09
George SZ et al. – The Fear of Daily Activities Questionnaire (FDAQ) is a potentially viable measure for fear of specific activities in physical therapy settings. These analyses suggest the FDAQ may be appropriate for determining graded exposure treatment plans and monitoring changes in fear levels, but is not appropriate as a screening tool.
Methods- A prospective cohort study. Reliability and validity cohorts were recruited from outpatient physical therapy clinics.
- Analyses for the reliability cohort included internal consistency and 48–hour test–retest coefficients, as well as standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change estimates.
- Analyses for the validity cohort included factor analysis for construct validity and correlation and multiple regression analyses for concurrent and predictive validity.
- Four–week responsiveness was assessed by paired t test, effect size calculation, and percentage of patients meeting or achieving MDC criterion.
- The FDAQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency and 48–hour test–retest properties.
- Factor analysis suggested a 2– or 3–factor solution consisting of loaded spine, postural, and spinal movement factors.
- The FDAQ demonstrated concurrent validity by contributing variance to disability (baseline and 4 weeks) and physical impairment (baseline) scores.
- In predictive validity analyses, baseline FDAQ scores did not contribute variance to 4–week disability and physical impairment scores, but changes in FDAQ scores were associated with changes in disability.
- The FDAQ scores significantly decreased over a 4–week treatment period, with an effect size of .86 and 55% of participants meeting the minimal detectable change criterion.
Related Articles
Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study
British Medical Journal, 10/09/09
Relevance Score: 85%
Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Low Back Pain Care For Medicare Patients
Health Affairs, 11/06/09
Relevance Score: 83%
Causes and prevention of low back pain in young athletes
Paediatrics & Child Health, 10/19/09
Relevance Score: 83%
Low back pain may be caused by disturbed pain regulation: A cross-sectional study in low back pain patients using tender point examination
European Journal of Pain, 10/08/09
Relevance Score: 83%
Socioeconomic position and low-back pain – the role of biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors in the GAZEL cohort
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 10/08/09
Relevance Score: 83%
Today in Pain Management...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Efficacy and safety of a single intrathecal methylprednisolone bolus in chronic complex regional pain syndrome
European Journal of Pain, 12/18/09
A randomised comparison of regular oral oxycodone and intrathecal morphine for post-caesarean analgesia
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia , 12/18/09
Increased pain sensitivity in alcohol withdrawal syndrome
European Journal of Pain, 12/18/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


