Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study Full Text
BMC Medicine,

Sanders T et al. – The authors conclude that the key obstacle to implementation of the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system for low back pain in primary care was an initial failure to achieve 'coherence' of the desired practice change with GPs. Despite this, GPs used the tool to different degrees, though this signified a general commitment to participating in the study rather than a deeper attitude change towards the new system.

Methods
  • Qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs before (n=32) and after (n=9) the introduction of a subgrouping for targeted treatment system.
  • GPs were offered an electronic 6-item subgrouping tool, to identify patients according to their risk of poor outcome ('high', 'low') in order to help inform decision-making about treatment approaches.
  • Recruitment was based on a 'maximum diversification sample', to obtain a wide representation of views across all 5 practices.
  • A coding scheme was developed based on the emergent findings, and the data were analysed using 'constant comparison', drawing upon insights and developing connections between themes.
  • They adopted the 'Normalisation Process Theory' (NPT) to explain the uptake of the new system and to examine the relevance of coherence for the implementation of innovations in organisations.

Results
  • GPs perceived back pain as a low clinical priority, and highlighted the importance of 'practical' and 'inter-personal' coherence in decisions to adopt and engage with the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system.
  • Health professionals often engage in 'sense making' about new innovations to 'road test' their applicability or relevance to daily clinical routines.
  • Low back pain was generally perceived as an 'uninteresting' and clinically unchallenging health problem by GPs, which may partly explain their lack of engagement with the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system.
  • The adoption of this new way of working by GPs was determined by the meaning that they ascribed to it in the context of their daily clinical routines.

Please login or register to follow this author.
► Click here to access Full Text, PubMed, Publisher and related articles...
<< Previous Article | Next Article >>

Your Unread Messages in Pain Management

See All >> Messages include industry-sponsored communications and special communications from MDLinx

Most Popular Pain Management Articles

Indexed Journals in Pain Management: more

Looking for a physician job? Let us help!

Register now for our free job placement service.
A career consultant will contact you soon.
Click Here for more information.

Get Started Now!

Free-of-charge, no obligation.

Terms and Conditions For M3 Career Consult

By registering with the M3 Career Consult service you authorize M3 USA Corporation to represent you in your job search. The following is a summary of the terms of our service and our mutual obligations to help you find a job:

  • You designate M3 to act as your agent and represent you in your job search;
  • You will not pay us for this service
  • You will advise us of any companies or positions to which you apply or have applied;
  • You will advise us if you believe you are not capable of performing a position for which we submit you, or for which you interview;
  • You will keep all information we provide you about companies or positions strictly confidential;
  • You will promptly provide us with information we request of you;
  • You will make yourself reasonably available for phone, video and in-person conversations and interviews;
  • You will be truthful in all of your communications with us; and
  • You will advise us if anything above changes.
 

The Top Read Articles of 2014 are Now Available

Scouring thousands of peer-reviewed journals and popular press, Our Editors just released the Top Read Articles of the Year. See the Top Read List