A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections
Pain Physician, 03/26/2012Manchikanti L et al.
This study illustrates that major complications are rare and minor side effects are common.
A prospective, non–randomized study of patients undergoing interventional techniques from May 2008 to December 2009.
A private interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center in the United States.
To assess the complication rate of fluoroscopically directed epidural injections.
This study was carried out over a period of 20 months and included over 10,000 procedures: 39% caudal epidurals, 23% cervical interlaminar epidurals, 14% lumbar interlaminar epidurals, 13% lumbar transforaminal epidurals, 8% percutaneous adhesiolysis, and 3% thoracic interlaminar epidural procedures.
All of the interventions were performed under fluoroscopic guidance in an ambulatory surgery center by one of 3 physicians.
The complications encountered during the procedure and postoperatively were prospectively evaluated.
Intravascular entry was higher for adhesiolysis (11.6%) and lumbar transforaminal (7.9%) procedures compared to other epidurals which ranged from 0.5% for lumbar, 3.1% for caudal, 4% for thoracic, and 4.1% for cervical epidurals.
Dural puncture was observed in a total of 0.5% of the procedures with 1% in the cervical region, 1.3% in the thoracic region, 0.8% with lumbar interlaminar epidurals, and 1.8% with adhesiolysis.
MDLinx connects healthcare professionals and patients to tomorrow's important medical news, while providing the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries with highly targeted interactive marketing, education, content, and medical research solutions.