Orthopedics Medical News about total knee arthroplasty;cost-effectiveness

Become a Member Today!
Register

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. Rapid correction of low vitamin D status in nursing home residents

3. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

4. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors

5. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States
Archives of Internal Medicine, 06/24/09

Losina E et al. – Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) appears to be cost-effective in the US Medicare-aged population, as currently practiced across all risk groups. Policy decisions should be made on the basis of available local options for TKA. However, when a high-volume hospital is available, TKAs confer even greater value per dollar spent than TKAs performed in low-volume centers.

Methods

Study determines the cost-effectiveness of TKA and the influences of hospital volume and patient risk on TKA cost-effectiveness
A Markov, state-transition, computer simulation model was developed and was populated with Medicare claims data and cost and outcomes data
Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for different risk populations and varied TKA intervention and hospital volume was estimated
Cost-effectiveness of TKA was estimated across all patient risk and hospital volume permutations

Results

Overall, TKA increased QALE from 6.822 to 7.957 quality-adjusted life yrs (QALYs)
Lifetime costs rose from $37,100 (no TKA) to $57,900 after TKA, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18,300 per QALY
For high-risk pts, TKA increased QALE from 5.713 to 6.594 QALY, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of $28,100 per QALY
At all risk levels, TKA was more costly and less effective in low-volume centers than in high-volume centers
Results were insensitive to variations of key input parameters within policy-relevant, clinically plausible ranges
Greatest variations were seen for the quality of life gain after TKA and the cost of TKA

<< Previous
Peroneal Tendon Tears, Surgical Management and Its Complications

Next >>
Internal Fixation Versus Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck...