Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials 3. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 4. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 5. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer
Top Ten Searches
post partum incontinence fibroid hpv colpotomy ovarian cyst curettage endometriosis intrauterine umbilical cordYour Article Summary
A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in fetal medicine
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology , 10/06/09
Knox EM et al. – The authors study reflects the paucity of good quality reviews in fetal medicine research. Existing reviews tend to be poor in reporting methodological features. Particularly, not enough attention is paid to assessment of validity of included studies and means to improving reliability of results through appropriate use of meta–analysis. There is a need for conducting further reviews and for rigour when reviewing fetal medicine research.
Today in General Gynecology...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Are a Speculum Examination and Wet Mount Always Necessary for Patients With Vaginal Symptoms? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 11/09/09
Obesity and Sexuality: Is There a Connection?
The Female Patient, 11/11/09
Diagnosis and Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11/09/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


