Ob/Gyn Medical News about iron and folic acid

Become a Member Today!
Register

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

3. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer

4. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

5. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Relative bioavailability of iron and folic acid from a new powdered supplement compared to a traditional tablet in pregnant women
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 07/28/09

Hartman–Craven B et al. – The unexpected lower bioavailability of iron from the powdered supplement is contrary to previously published reports. However, since pills and capsules are known to be poorly accepted by some women during pregnancy, it is reasonable to continue to explore alternative micronutrient delivery systems and forms of iron for this purpose.

<< Previous
Common myths among a group of Iranian women concerning sexual...

Next >>
A variant in the gene FUT9 is associated with susceptibility to...

Mortality Rates Reduced Among Children Whose Mothers Received Iron-folic Acid Supplements
ScienceDaily, 10/29/09 Relevance Score: 82%

Is adequate and balanced nutrition during pregnancy more effective than iron and folic acid supplements
Central European Journal of Medicine, 10/30/09 Relevance Score: 81%

Cancer incidence and mortality after treatment with folic acid and Vitamin B12
JAMA, 11/18/09 Relevance Score: 71%

A randomized trial on folic acid supplementation and risk of recurrent colorectal adenoma
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 10/29/09 Relevance Score: 71%

Folic acid source, usual intake, and folate and vitamin B-12 status in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 10/15/09 Relevance Score: 71%