mdlinx mdlinx

MDLinx E-mail Article

To email this article, enter your own "From Email" address, the recipient's "To Email" address, and click the "Send Email" button. You may send to up to 5 emails at a time.


* From Email: 
* To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
Email Subject Line: 
Comments:

Gaviscon(R) vs. Omeprazole in symptomatic treatment of moderate gastroesophageal reflux. A direct comparative randomised trial

Pouchain D et al. – Gaviscon(R) was non–inferior to omeprazole in achieving a 24–h heartburn–free period in moderate episodic heartburn, and is a relevant effective alternative treatment in moderate GERD in primary care.

Methods
  • A 14–day multicentre randomised double–blind double–dummy non–inferiority trial compared Gaviscon(R) (4 x 10 mL/day) and omeprazole (20 mg/day) in patients with 2–6 day heartburn episodes weekly without alarm signals.
  • The primary outcome was the mean time to onset of the first 24–h heartburn–free period after initial dosing.
  • Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients without heartburn by D7, pain relief by D7, and reduction in pain intensity by D7 and D14.
  • 278 patients were recruited; 120 were included in the Gaviscon(R) group and 121 in the omeprazole group for the per protocol non–inferiority analysis.

Results
  • The mean time to onset of the first 24–h heartburn–free period after initial dosing was 2.0 (+/–2.2) days for Gaviscon(R) and 2.0 (+/–2.3) days for omeprazole (p = 0.93); mean intergroup difference was 0.01 +/– 1.55 days (95% CI = 0.41 to 0.43): i.e., less than the lower limit of the 95% CI of 0.5 days predetermined to demonstrate non–inferiority.
  • The mean number of heartburn–free days by D7 was significantly greater in the omeprazole group: 3.7 +/– 2.3 days vs. 3.1 +/– 2.1 (p = 0.02).
  • On D7, overall quality of pain relief was slightly in favour of omeprazole (p = 0.049).
  • There was no significant difference in the reduction in pain intensity between groups by D7 (p = 0.11) or D14 (p = 0.08).
  • Tolerance and safety were good and comparable in both groups.
[more...]

Register now to view all the MDLinx contents (FREE)!

  • Stay current on the latest literature, research and clinical news
  • Get special communications and offers from MDLinx and our sponsors
  • Receive invitations to paid market research
View Samples and Register

Stay current - Media Tool

Newsletter
RSS
Follow Us
Facebook

Receive free subspecialty
"5-minute updates" via email

Sign up!

Send the E-mail Newsletter to a Colleague


Send

Subscribe to our free RSS feeds:
Get the latest news in your specialty automatically added to your newsreader or your personal My Yahoo!, Google, My MSN or My AOL page. Learn More

Follow Us on Twitter
Twitter is a rich source of instantly updated information. Join today and follow @MDLinx to start receiving tweets. Learn More

Close