Your Messages Inbox
Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Use of Antiemetic Agents in Acute Gastroenteritis 4. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 5. AHA Guidelines on Cardiac CT for Assessing Coronary Artery Disease
Your Article Summary
See Latest ArticlesComparison of arthroscopic and open treatment of septic arthritis of the wrist
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 06/02/09
Sammer DM et al. – Study demonstrates that arthroscopic irrigation and débridement is an effective treatment for patients with isolated septic arthritis of the wrist; these patients had fewer operations and a shorter hospital stay than did patients who had received open treatment. However, these benefits were not seen in patients with multiple sites of infection.
Methods- A comparison of arthroscopic and open techniques in pts with septic arthritis of wrist
- Pts initially treated over an 11-year period, with open or arthroscopic irrigation and débridement
- Clinical presentation, laboratory and microbiological findings, hospital course, complications, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups
- Between 1997 and 2007, 36 pts with septic arthritis involving a total of 40 wrists were identified
- 19 wrists (17 pts) were initially treated with open irrigation and débridement, and 21 wrists (19 pts) were initially treated arthroscopically
- 11 wrists in the open-treatment cohort required repeat irrigation and debridement
- 8 wrists in the arthroscopy cohort required a repeat procedure
- If a repeat irrigation and débridement was required, it was performed in an open fashion in all but 2 cases
- No patient treated with arthroscopic irrigation and débridement required a second operation
- The pts who went through open method stayed longer in in the hospital
- The 90-day perioperative mortality rate in the series was substantial
Douglas M. Sammer, 06/16/09
| Although arthroscopy has proven very useful for treating septic arthritis in large joints such as the knee and hip, arthroscopic I&D of the wrist has not been previously evaluated. This study demonstrates potential advantages to arthroscopic I&D of the wrist. However, some questions remain unanswered. For example, does the chronicity of the infection affect which treatment method (open vs. arthroscopic) should be used? A prospective randomized study would provide more useful information about the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of arthroscopic versus open I&D. Because of the relatively low incidence of septic arthritis in the wrist, this would likely require a multi-center collaborative effort. |
Today in Ortho/Rheum...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Osteoarthritis: A review of treatment options
Geriatrics, 10/21/09
Doxycycline for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
Cochrane Reviews, 10/23/09
Bisphosphonate therapy: When not to monitor BMD
The Journal of Family Practice, 11/02/09
Article Search
Sponsor