Kidney RSS News Feeds

Nephrology

sponsor
Become a Member Today!
Register
Email:


Password:

Remember me
Forgot your Password?
Invite Code?
Article ID

Your Article Summary

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Srisubat A et al. – This review aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications between ESWL and stones removing using the nephroscopy through the skin at kidney level (PCNL) or ureteroscope through the bladder and ureter to the kidney (RIRS). Three small randomised studies (214 patients) were included. Two studies compared ESWL with PCNL and one study compared ESWL with RIRS. Patients with lower pole kidney stones who undergo PCNL have a higher success rate than ESWL whereas RIRS was not significantly different from ESWL. However, ESWL patients spent less time in hospital and the duration of treatment was shorter.

Related Articles

Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 10/16/09    Relevance Score: 93%

CT can detect rare post-percutanous nephrolithotomy complications
Urology Times, 11/04/09    Relevance Score: 87%

Ultrasonic, Pneumatic and Combination Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Journal of Endourology, 10/02/09    Relevance Score: 87%

Treatment Outcomes for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Renal Allografts
Journal of Endourology, 10/12/09    Relevance Score: 81%

Lower-Pole Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Renal Access: Which Calix Is Posterior
Journal of Endourology, 10/09/09    Relevance Score: 80%

Article Search

Keyword:

Search:

Published within

Sort By:
Date
Relevance


Sponsor

Send this Summary to a Colleague

Enter email address