Your Messages Inbox
Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Use of Antiemetic Agents in Acute Gastroenteritis 4. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 5. AHA Guidelines on Cardiac CT for Assessing Coronary Artery Disease
Your Article Summary
See Latest ArticlesHow ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors
Medical Education, 05/18/09
Bullock AD et al. - On average, each trainee received nine assessment forms from a range of staff, most commonly nurses. Although concerns were identified for the minority, ratings varied by staff group. Peers (other FP doctors or SHOs) and administrators or managers were four and three times, respectively, less likely to indicate concern. By contrast, consultants and sisters (senior nurses) were more likely to give concern ratings. Guidance on the selection of assessors in any MSF process should take into account findings that rating behaviour varies by staff group.
Today in Residency/Internship...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Clinic Systems and the Quality of Care for Older Adults in Residency Clinics and in Physician Practices
Academic Medicine, 12/04/09
Improving Quality in an Internal Medicine Residency Program Through a Peer Medical Record Audit
Academic Medicine, 12/03/09
Skills of Internal Medicine Residents in Disclosing Medical Errors: A Study Using Standardized Patients
Academic Medicine, 12/03/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor