Internal Med

sponsor
Become a Member Today!
Register
Email:


Password:

Remember me
Forgot your Password?
Invite Code?
Article ID

Your Article Summary

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Dworkin RH et al. – In this article, the authors first describe the essential differences between the interpretation of the clinical importance of patient improvements and of group differences. The authors then discuss the factors to consider when evaluating the clinical importance of group differences, which include the results of responder analyses of the primary outcome measure, the treatment effect size compared to available therapies, analyses of secondary efficacy endpoints, the safety and tolerability of treatment, the rapidity of onset and durability of the treatment benefit, convenience, cost, limitations of existing treatments, and other factors.

   

Related Articles

Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: Outcomes in a workers' compensation setting
Pain, 11/02/09    Relevance Score: 82%

Increase in Quality, but Not Quantity, of Clinical Trials in Acute Pain: 1992 Versus 2007
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 10/21/09    Relevance Score: 82%

Measurement of self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 10/08/09    Relevance Score: 82%

A Clinical Trial of Gene Therapy for Chronic Pain
Pain Medicine, 10/14/09    Relevance Score: 81%

Tapentadol immediate release for the relief of moderate-to-severe acute pain
Expert Opinion in Pharmacotherapy, 10/08/09    Relevance Score: 81%


Sponsor

Article Search

Keyword:

Search:

Published within

Sort By:
Date
Relevance


Sponsor

Sponsor

Send this Summary to a Colleague

Enter email address