Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 4. AHA Guidelines on Cardiac CT for Assessing Coronary Artery Disease 5. Rapid correction of low vitamin D status in nursing home residents
Top Ten Searches
etanercept hypertension chf antiphospholipid fibrosis mrsa scid renal cell rickets counterpulsationYour Article Summary
BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD
Osteoporosis International, 10/02/09
Pulkkinen P et al. – The study suggests that the risk of trochanteric fractures could be discriminated based on a BMD T-score <?2.5 criterion, whereas cervical fracture cases would remain under-diagnosed if solely using this criterion. Instead, geometrical risk factors are able to discriminate cervical fracture cases even among individuals with T-score >?2.5. For cervical and trochanteric fractures combined, BMD and geometric measures independently contributed to hip fracture discrimination. Our data support changing from T-score <?2.5 to a more comprehensive assessment of hip fracture etiology, in which fracture type is also taken into account.
Methods- Postmenopausal females with non-pathologic cervical (n?=?39) or trochanteric (n?=?18) hip fracture (mean age 74.2 years)
- 40 age-matched controls
- BMD measured at femoral neck, and femoral neck axis length, femoral neck and shaft cortex thicknesses (FNC and FSC), and femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) measured from radiographs
- BMD T-score threshold of ?2.5 was able to discriminate trochanteric fractures from controls
- 17 out of 18 trochanteric fractures occurred in individuals with T-score ≤ ?2.5
- T-score criterion not able to discriminate cervical fractures
- 20 of these fractures (51.3%) occurred in individuals with BMD in osteoporotic range and 19 (48.7%) in individuals with T-score >?2.5
- Within these non-osteoporotic cervical fracture patients (N?=?19) and non-osteoporotic controls (N?=?35), 83.3% classified correctly based on a model including NSA and FNC (p?0.001), area under the receiver operating characteristics curve being 0.85 for the model was only 0.56 for BMD alone
Today in Orthopedic/Physical Med...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Effect of Hand Warming on Electrodiagnostic Testing Results and Diagnosis in Patients With Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 12/10/09
Planning, Leisure-Time Physical Activity, and Coping Self-Efficacy in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 12/10/09
Randomized Controlled Trial for Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection for Adhesive Capsulitis: Ultrasonography-Guided Versus Blind Technique
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 12/10/09
Today in Rheumatology...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
A new graph and scoring system simplified analysis of changing states: disease remissions in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 12/10/09
Does classification of persons with fibromyalgia into Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroups detect differences in outcome after a standard chronic pain management program?
Pain Research and Management, 12/10/09
Durability of Therapeutic Response to Milnacipran Treatment for Fibromyalgia. Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Monotherapy 6-Month Extension Study
Pain Medicine, 12/10/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


