Today's top medical abstracts
Internal Med
Become a Member Today!
Email
Password
Remember me
Forgot your Password?

Invite Code?

Home
General Internal Med
Messages
Conferences
Jobs
Newsletters
My Library
Topics in
Internal Med
        Academic Med/Education
        Adolescent Medicine
        Allergy/Immunology
        Atherosclerosis/Lipids
        Basic Science/Genetics
        Cardiology
        Clinical Pharmacology
        Complementary Medicine
        Critical Care/
    Hospitalist
        Dermatology
        Economics of Medicine
        Endocrinology
        Epidemiology
        Gastroenterology
        Geriatrics
        Hematology/Oncology
        Infectious Disease
        Nephrology/Urology
        Neurology
        Orthopedic/Physical Med
        Popular Press
        Preventive Medicine
        Primary Care
        Psychiatry
        Pulmonology
        Radiology/Diagnostics
        Rheumatology
        Sports Medicine
        Vascular Medicine
        Women`s Health
 
Help
Resource Center
RSS News Feeds
Send Newsletter
to a Friend
 
Sponsor
Cancer Science: #14. Does Size Matter? "Stumpy" Telomeres Allow Cancer Cells to Evade Senescence
Sara Hartley, MDLinx Oncology
  See all
Gastric cancer Article Summary

Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website
How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 07/14/08
Print     Email This Article     Save in My Library   Free Abstract
Puli SR et al. - Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) results are more accurate with advanced disease than early disease. If EUS diagnoses advanced disease, such as T4 disease, the patient is 500 times more likely to have true anatomic stage of T4 disease.

Methods
  • Study to evaluate the accuracy of EUS for staging of gastric cancers
  • Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected
  • Only studies from which a 2 multiply 2 table could be constructed for true positive, false negative, false positive and true negative values were included
  • Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data
  • The differences were resolved by mutual agreement
  • 2 multiply 2 tables were constructed with the data extracted from each study
  • Meta-analysis for the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio

Results
  • 376/1620 relevant articles were selected and reviewed
  • 22 studies (n=1896) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis
  • Pooled sensitivity of T1 was 88.1% and T2 was 82.3%
  • For T3, pooled sensitivity was 89.7%
  • T4 had a pooled sensitivity of 99.2%
  • For nodal staging, the pooled sensitivity for N1 was 58.2% and N2 was 64.9%
  • Pooled sensitivity to diagnose distant metastasis was 73.2%
  • The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >0.10

 

--- GASTROENTEROLOGY TOP ARTICLES ---

Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email



 

--- HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY TOP ARTICLES ---

Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email



 

Sponsor
--- RADIOLOGY/DIAGNOSTICS TOP ARTICLES ---

Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email



Sponsor
Read a Different Specialty
Allergy/Immunology
Anesthesiology
Cardiology
Dermatology
Drugs
Emergency Medicine
Endocrinology
ENT
Family Medicine
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Disease
Internal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
OB/Gyn
Ophthalmology
Orthopedics
Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Pulmonology
Radiology
Rheumatology
Surgery
Urology
Profession Index
Dentist
Hospital Administrator
Nurse
    Medical Students
Nurse Practitioner
Pharma/Drug Marketer
    Pharmacist
Physician
Physician Assistants
Article Search
Keyword:
Search:
Published within:
Sort By:
Date Relevance
    
Sponsor
About MDLinx  |  Contact  |  Advertise with MDLinx  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sign Up For Newsletters  |  Recommend this Site

English |  Español |  Français |  Deutsch |  中文 |  Руccкий |  Norsk |  Nederlands |  Português |  Italiano

©1999-2008 MDLinx, Inc.