mdlinx mdlinx

MDLinx E-mail Article

To email this article, enter your own "From Email" address, the recipient's "To Email" address, and click the "Send Email" button. You may send to up to 5 emails at a time.


* From Email: 
* To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
To Email: 
Email Subject Line: 
Comments:

In moderate-to-severe asthma patients monitoring exhaled nitric oxide during exacerbation is not a good predictor of spirometric response to oral corticosteroid

Gelb AF et al. – Increased versus normal exhaled NO during outpatient exacerbation in patients with moderate–to–severe asthma on inhaled corticosteroid and long–acting β2–agonist but not maintenance oral corticosteroid does not preclude a robust clinical and spirometric response to tapering oral prednisone.

Methods
  • After measuring the fraction of exhaled NO (Feno [ppb]) at 50, 100, 150, and 200 mL/s, the total Feno at 50 mL/s (ppb), large central airway NO flux (J’awNO [nL/s]), and peripheral small airway/alveolar NO concentration (CANO [ppb]) were calculated and corrected for NO axial back-diffusion.
  • Outpatient exacerbation required the patient with asthma to be afebrile with normal chest x-ray and white blood cell count.

Results
  • Group 1 included 17 patients (6 men) with asthma, age 52 ± 12 years, studied at baseline, during 18 exacerbations with abnormal Feno at 50 mL/s, J’awNO, and/or CANO, and post 8- to 10-day tapering 40 mg prednisone (recovery).
  • Baseline: IgE, 332 ± 243 K μ; total blood eosinophils, 304 ± 266 cells/ μL; body mass index, 28 ± 6; ACT, 16 to 19; and FEV1, 2.5 ± 0.7 L (86% ± 20% predicted); exacerbation: FEV1, 1.7 ± 0.4 L (60% ± 17%) (P < .001); recovery: FEV1, 2.5 ± 0.7 L (85% ± 13%) (P < .001).
  • Group 2 included 11 (7 men) similarly treated patients with asthma, age 49 ± 14 years, studied at baseline, during 15 exacerbations with normal Feno at 50 mL/s, J’awNO, and CANO.
  • Baseline: IgE, 307 ± 133 K μ; total blood eosinophils, 296 ± 149 cells/ μL; body mass index, 28 ± 6; ACT, 16 to 19; and FEV1, 2.7 ± 0.9 L (71% ± 12% predicted); exacerbation: FEV1, 1.7 ± 0.6 L (54% ± 19%) (P < .006); recovery: FEV1, 2.7 ± 0.9 L (70% ± 14%) (P = .002).
  • On comparing group 1 versus group 2, there was no significant difference for baseline IgE, eosinophils, body mass index, and ACT and similar significant (≤.006) decrease from baseline in FEV1 (L) during exacerbation and similar increase (≤.006) at recovery.
[more...]

Register now to view all the MDLinx contents (FREE)!

  • Stay current on the latest literature, research and clinical news
  • Get special communications and offers from MDLinx and our sponsors
  • Receive invitations to paid market research
View Samples and Register

Stay current - Media Tool

Newsletter
RSS
Follow Us
Facebook

Receive free subspecialty
"5-minute updates" via email

Sign up!

Send the E-mail Newsletter to a Colleague


Send

Subscribe to our free RSS feeds:
Get the latest news in your specialty automatically added to your newsreader or your personal My Yahoo!, Google, My MSN or My AOL page. Learn More

Follow Us on Twitter
Twitter is a rich source of instantly updated information. Join today and follow @MDLinx to start receiving tweets. Learn More

Close