Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials 4. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 5. Sentinel node biopsy is important in mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ
Top Ten Searches
brca1 prostate-specific antigen sclc fobt egd bmi dysplasia hematologic ovarian hccYour Article Summary
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis
The Lancet Oncology - Online First, 10/01/09
Gold JS et al. – The nomogram accurately predicts RFS after resection of localised primary GIST and could be used to select patients for adjuvant imatinib therapy.
Methods- 127 patients
- Nomogram to predict RFS based on tumour size (cm), location (stomach, small intestine, colon/rectum, or other), and mitotic index developed
- Nomogram was tested in patients from the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS; n=212) and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA (Mayo; n=148)
- Nomogram assessed by calculating concordance probabilities and testing calibration of predicted RFS with observed RFS
- Concordance probabilities also compared with those of three commonly used staging systems
- Nomogram had a concordance probability of 0·78 (SE 0·02) in the MSKCC dataset, and 0·76 (0·03) and 0·80 (0·02) in validation cohorts
- Nomogram predictions well calibrated
- Inclusion of tyrosine kinase mutation status in nomogram did not improve its discriminatory ability
- Concordance probabilities of nomogram were better than those of the two NIH staging systems (0·76 [0·03] vs 0·70 and 0·66 in the GEIS validation cohort; 0·80 [0·02] vs 0·74 [0·02, p=0·04] and 0·78 [0·02, p=0·05] in the Mayo cohort) and similar to those of the AFIP-Miettinen staging system (0·76 [0·03] vs 0·73 [0·004, p=0·28] in the GEIS cohort; 0·80 [0·02] vs 0·76 [0·003, p=0·09] in the Mayo cohort) Nomogra
- Nomogram predictions of RFS seemed better calibrated than predictions made with AFIP-Miettinen system
Today in GI Oncology...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
A new staging system is more discriminant than conventional staging systems for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology, 11/24/09
Pancreatic endocrine tumors: Expression profiling evidences a role for AKT-mTOR pathway
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11/24/09
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 has dual effects on gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell viability and sensitivity to the anti-tumor effects of imatinib mesylate in vitro
Molecular Cancer, 11/23/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


