Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials 4. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 5. Sentinel node biopsy is important in mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ
Top Ten Searches
brca1 prostate-specific antigen sclc fobt egd bmi dysplasia hematologic ovarian hccYour Article Summary
Study of bioaccumulation of dalteparin at a therapeutic dose in patients with renal insufficiency
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 09/25/09
Wuillemin WA et al. – Therapeutically dosed dalteparin accumulates in patients with severe RI (group C). Dose adjustments according to anti–Xa are recommended for dalteparin if used in this patient population. However, no simple dosing scheme can be suggested yet because of wide inter–individual variation.
Pirmin Schmid and Walter A. Wuillemin, 09/30/09
| Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are effective, safe and convenient for anticoagulation. Their use is limited in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) because of bioaccumulation. Patients with severe RI (i.e. glomerular filtration rate GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2) have both, an increased bleeding risk and an increased risk for thromboembolic events. The pharmacokinetic data of a specific LMWH cannot be transferred to other LMWH because of various levels of bioaccumulation in RI (Swiss Med Wkly 2009;139:438-52). The present study reports bioaccumulation data of therapeutically dosed dalteparin in patients with severe RI. It extends the previously reported results of prophylactically dosed dalteparin in patients with severe RI that showed no significant bioaccumulation up to median 10 days of prophylaxis (J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:552-8). Controls of anti-Xa levels and dose adjustments according to these values are recommended for therapeutically dosed dalteparin if used in this patient population. However, no simple dosing scheme can be suggested yet because of wide inter-individual variation. Furthermore, i.v. unfractionated heparin (UFH) may be preferred to s.c. LMWH for sub-populations with certain risk factors as detailed in the article. A larger study is recommended that would be powered also for clinical end-points. |
Related Articles
Administration of Dalteparin Based on the Activated Clotting Time for Prophylaxis of Hepatic Vessel Thrombosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Transplantation Proceedings, 11/20/09
Relevance Score: 87%%
Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Activin A/Follistatin System Activation during Hemodialysis with Different Low Molecular Weight Heparins
Renal Failure, 11/25/09
Relevance Score: 80%%
ADAMTS13 and von Willebrand factor concentrations in patients with diabetes mellitus
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 11/03/09
Relevance Score: 80%%
Today in Coagulation/Bleeding Dz...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1992 to 2008: clinical outcomes and risk factors for relapse
Transfusion, 12/19/09
Prolonged elevation of plasma argatroban in a cardiac transplant patient with a suspected history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis
Transfusion, 12/19/09
Particulate Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Risk: Short-term and Long-term Effects
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 12/15/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


