Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology 3. Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials 4. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer 5. Sentinel node biopsy is important in mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ
Top Ten Searches
brca1 prostate-specific antigen sclc fobt egd bmi dysplasia hematologic ovarian hccYour Article Summary
Improved survival for stage iv melanoma from an unknown primary site
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 05/20/09
Lee CC et al. - In a study to determine whether a survival advantage for nodal metastasis of melanoma from an unknown primary (MUP) vs melanoma from a known primary (MKP) would extend to MUP pts with distant (stage IV) metastasis, it was shown that the survival advantage also applies to pts with stage IV MUP. The mechanism responsible for this improved survival may provide clues for more effective treatment of stage IV melanoma and warrants further investigation. Improved results for MUP suggest that these pts deserve aggressive therapy.
Methods- Prospectively acquired data for 2247 pts diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma were reviewed.
- Cox regression analysis in a multivariate model identified prognostic factors significant for survival.
- MUP and MKP patients were then matched by significant covariates.
- Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis.
- There were 1849 MKP and 398 MUP pts.
- Multivariate analysis of pts with complete data sets identified known/unknown primary and 5 other significant covariates: age, sex, site of metastasis, number of different metastatic sites, and decade of diagnosis.
- Prognostic matching yielded 392 MUP-MKP pairs.
- Median OS and 5-yr OS rate were significantly greater for MUP pts than for all matched MKP pts or for MKP pts matched by M1 category (for M1b and M1c) or number of metastatic sites.
Related Articles
Phase I/II study of a cisplatin-taxol-dacarbazine regimen in metastatic melanoma
American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10/06/09
Relevance Score: 81%
Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 2/3 study of lenalidomide in the treatment of pretreated relapsed or refractory metastatic malignant melanoma
Cancer, 10/30/09
Relevance Score: 80%
Local and Distant Immunity Induced by Intralesional Vaccination with an Oncolytic Herpes Virus Encoding GM-CSF in Patients with Stage IIIc and IV Melanoma
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 11/18/09
Relevance Score: 79%
A multi-center phase II evaluation of the small molecule survivin suppressor YM155 in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma
Investigational New Drugs, 10/23/09
Relevance Score: 79%
A phase II, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of weekly elesclomol plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone for stage IV metastatic melanoma
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10/19/09
Relevance Score: 79%
Today in Dermatologic Oncology...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Depression in hospitalized patients with malignant melanoma treated with interferon-alpha-2b: primary to induced disorders
European Journal of Dermatology, 12/01/09
Self-reported screening for skin cancer in Austria
European Journal of Dermatology, 12/01/09
Expression of MMP-10, MMP-21, MMP-26, and MMP-28 in Merkel cell carcinoma
Virchows Archiv, 11/30/09
Sponsor
Article Search
Sponsor
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


