Your Messages Inbox
Your Article Summary
See Latest ArticlesDisagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
British Medical Journal, 09/08/09
Tendal B et al. – Disagreements were common and often larger than the effect of commonly used treatments. Meta–analyses using SMDs are prone to observer variation and should be interpreted with caution. The reliability of meta–analyses might be improved by having more detailed review protocols, more than one observer, and statistical expertise.
Related Articles
A Population-based Study of Spinal Metastatic Disease in South-East Norway
Clinical Oncology, 11/12/09
Relevance Score: 80%
Magnesium and headache after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 10/26/09
Relevance Score: 80%
Today in Drug Trials...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
ARIAD Announces Full Enrollment in Phase 3 Succeed Trial Evaluating Ridaforolimus in Patients with Metastatic Sarcomas
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, 12/18/09
Phase I trial of motexafin gadolinium and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced malignancies
Investigational New Drugs, 12/18/09
Prognostic Factors in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 12/17/09
Article Search
Sponsor