Your Article Summary
The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 06/05/09
Borm GF et al. - The results of a single trial should be interpreted with caution. When it is difficult to predict or determine how trial-specific factors influence the results, the best way to evaluate the performance of a treatment is to use multiple, possibly smaller, trials.
Related Articles
Increase in Quality, but Not Quantity, of Clinical Trials in Acute Pain: 1992 Versus 2007
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 10/21/09
Relevance Score: 69%
Cytokinetics Announces Advancement of CK-2017357 in Phase I Clinical Trials
Cytokinetics, 11/10/09
Relevance Score: 68%
Methodological aspects of lung cancer clinical trials in the era of targeted agents
Lung Cancer, 11/03/09
Relevance Score: 68%
Boston Scientific Announces Exclusive Sponsorship and First Enrollments of MADIT-RIT Clinical Trial
Boston Scientific, 10/06/09
Relevance Score: 68%
Safety and efficacy of NAD depleting cancer drugs: results of a phase I clinical trial of CHS 828 and overview of published data
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 10/05/09
Relevance Score: 68%
Today in Drug Trials...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
The Unintended Consequences of Clinical Trials Regulations
PLoS Medicine, 12/04/09
Characterization of Baseline Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Recovered from Phase IV Clinical Trial for Linezolid
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 12/03/09
Bayer Starts Phase III Trial with Florbetaben
BayNews International, 12/01/09
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


