Your Article Summary
How do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design
Trials, 05/05/09
Barthel FMS et al. - Multi-arm, multi-stage trials are an effective way of speeding up the therapy evaluation process. The design performs well in terms of the type I and II error rates.
Related Articles
Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
Cochrane Reviews, 10/13/09
Relevance Score: 94%
Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Trial Designs of Analgesics: Focus on Methodology
The Clinical Journal of Pain, 10/21/09
Relevance Score: 91%
Centralized Review Process Markedly Expedites Approval of Cancer Clinical Trials
NIH, 10/20/09
Relevance Score: 91%
Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Intensive Care Medicine, 10/05/09
Relevance Score: 91%
Boston Scientific Announces Exclusive Sponsorship and First Enrollments of MADIT-RIT Clinical Trial
Boston Scientific, 10/06/09
Relevance Score: 90%
Today in Research & Development...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
GlaxoSmithKline and NanoBio announce OTC licensing agreement for cold sore treatment
GlaxoSmithKline, 12/18/09
ARIAD Announces Full Enrollment in Phase 3 Succeed Trial Evaluating Ridaforolimus in Patients with Metastatic Sarcomas
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, 12/18/09
CCHIT Appoints Officers
HealthDataManagement, 12/18/09
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


