Dentistry Medical News about Orthodontic Retainers

Become a Member Today!
Register

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors

4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System

5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear
European Journal of Orthodontics , 10/16/09

Thickett E et al. – The only statistically significant difference was found to be at T3 and T4 for overbite (P = 0.05 and P = 0.02, respectively). PAR scoring showed more variable changes in group 2. There was good correlation for the measurement method. There was no statistical difference for the two groups for overjet, arch length, intermolar width, intercanine width, and irregularity index at any time point.

<< Previous
Does orthodontic tooth movement cause an elevation in systemic...

Next >>
Determinants for oral hygiene and periodontal status among...

Adhesive Properties of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers to Enamel: Stainless Steel Wire vs Fiber-reinforced Composites
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 10/23/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/21/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/02/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Microleakage between composite–wire and composite–enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/27/09 Relevance Score: 67%

Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/12/09 Relevance Score: 66%