Dentistry Medical News about Orthodontic Retainers

Become a Member Today!
Register

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors

4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System

5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial
European Journal of Orthodontics , 10/12/09

Shawesh M et al. – The aim of this trial was to compare two different orthodontic retention regimens. There were no statistically significant differences between the two retention regimens at T2 for labial segment irregularity or crowding. Since both retention regimens were equally effective during the 1 year retention period, it would seem clinically acceptable to ask patients to wear their retainers at night only.

<< Previous
Cognitive dissonance in the treatment of traumatic dental...

Next >>
Re-anatomization of Anterior Eroded Teeth by Stratification with...

Adhesive Properties of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers to Enamel: Stainless Steel Wire vs Fiber-reinforced Composites
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 10/23/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/21/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/02/09 Relevance Score: 68%

Microleakage between composite–wire and composite–enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite
European Journal of Orthodontics, 10/27/09 Relevance Score: 67%

Long-term effects of orthodontic therapy on the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 10/30/09 Relevance Score: 65%