Anesthesia Medical News about Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Injections, Epidural Morphine

Your Unread Messages

See All

Tracy Hampton, PhD

FDA Update

Anti-CD20 Antibody Granted Accelerated Approval for CLL

Roberta Buell, MBA
Congress Proposes SGR Fix

Dorothy J. Schirf, MD

Technology Advances

Radiosurgery Trial Sparks Optimism for Early Lung Cancer

Sara Hartley

Cancer Science

Using Embryonic Stem Cells to Test Breast Cancer Genes

See All Messages (38 new messages)

Hello, Suzanne Dixon
Manage E-mail | Logout

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors

4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System

5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Meta-analysis of the effect of extended-release epidural morphine versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on respiratory depression
Journal of Opioid Management, 11/03/09

Sumida S et al. – Although perioperative single–dose epidural extended–release epidural morphine (EREM) (versus IV–PCA) was effective for postoperative pain relief for up to 48 hours, it is associated with significantly higher odds of respiratory depression. Further examination of the issue of respiratory depression of epidural EREM may be warranted.

Methods

A systematic literature search of the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database was conducted for terms related to EREM.
Only randomized controlled trials, in the English language, assessing the rates of respiratory depression of EREM to IV–PCA were included for analysis.
Data on pertinent study characteristics and relevant outcomes were extracted from accepted articles. Meta–analysis was performed using the Review Manager 4.2.7 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2004). A random effects model was used.

Results

The authors’ literature search yielded 3 articles which met all inclusion criteria. All studied doses of EREM were evaluated. Pooled estimates (odds ratio) were made for rates of adverse events of respiratory depression.
Use of EREM was associated with significantly higher odds of respiratory depression compared to IV–PCA (odds ratio = 5.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.08, 30.54, p = 0.04).
Even when examining only Food and Drug Administration approved dosages for EREM, the use of EREM was associated with significantly higher odds of respiratory depression when compared with IV–PCA (odds ratio = 5.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 31.93, p = 0.04).

<< Previous
Perioperative management of outpatients with implantable...

Next >>
Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean...