Anesthesia Medical News about cardiac output monitor

Become a Member Today!
Register

Most Viewed Abstracts

1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians

2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income

3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors

4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System

5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text

Your Article Summary

See Latest Articles

(Click the title below to leave the MDLinx Network and go to the Journal's Website)

Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter
British Journal of Anesthesia, 11/02/09

Thom O et al. – Cardiac output (CO) cannot reliably be estimated by clinical examination. The authors aimed to measure the agreement between CO measurements using a supra–sternal Doppler monitor and the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). There was poor agreement between CO measurements done with the supra–sternal Doppler monitor and PAC.

<< Previous
Infusion of hypertonic saline/starch during cardiopulmonary...

Next >>
Spinal anaesthesia

Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FlowTrac/Vigileo(R) - derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study
Critical Care, 11/11/09 Relevance Score: 81%

Minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 11/11/09 Relevance Score: 80%

Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 11/09/09 Relevance Score: 80%

Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 10/16/09 Relevance Score: 80%

Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients
BMC Anesthesiology, 10/15/09 Relevance Score: 80%