Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors 4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System 5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text
Your Article Summary
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
Cochrane Reviews, 10/19/09
Srisubat A et al. – This review aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications between ESWL and stones removing using the nephroscopy through the skin at kidney level (PCNL) or ureteroscope through the bladder and ureter to the kidney (RIRS). Three small randomised studies (214 patients) were included. Two studies compared ESWL with PCNL and one study compared ESWL with RIRS. Patients with lower pole kidney stones who undergo PCNL have a higher success rate than ESWL whereas RIRS was not significantly different from ESWL. However, ESWL patients spent less time in hospital and the duration of treatment was shorter.
Today in Stone Disease...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Drug dosage protocol for calcium oxalate stone
Urological Research - Urolithiasis, 10/23/09
Sonographic detection of renal and ureteral stones. Value of the twinkling sign
International Braz J Urol, 10/30/09
[Alpha]-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis
BJU International, 11/09/09
Article Search
Sponsor


See Latest Articles


