Your Messages Inbox
Most Viewed Abstracts
1. Report Shows Shift in Starting Salaries for Physicians 2. 2008 Exclusive Survey—Earnings: Good news for primary care income 3. Medicare pay-for-reporting effort draws fire from frustrated doctors 4. Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System 5. Doctors and the DEA Free full text
Top Ten Searches
periodontitis pharyngitis gingivitis amalgam fluoride mutans pulp candidiasis pulp malocclusionYour Article Summary
See Latest ArticlesAn in vitro assessment of the effect of load and pH on wear between opposing enamel and dentine surfaces
Archives of Oral Biology, 07/18/08
Ranjitkar S et al. - Dentine wear increased with increasing load, and dentine wear was faster at pH 1.2 than at pH 3.0 or 6.1 for all loads tested. Interestingly, enamel wore more rapidly than dentine at pH 1.2 under all loads. At pH values of 3.0 and 6.1, enamel wear rates were not measurably different from zero and they were less than wear rates for opposing dentine specimens at all loads. Micrographic assessment showed extensive surface destruction of dentine wear facets due to erosion at pH 1.2. Dentine wear facets were smoother at pH 3.0 that at pH 6.1.
Today in Dental Materials...keeping you current
Receive free subspecialty "5-minute updates" via email
Dental Enamel Irradiated with Infrared Diode Laser and Photo-Absorbing Cream
Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 11/05/09
Factors Affecting Survival and Usefulness of Implants Placed in Vascularized Free Composite Grafts Used in Post–Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 10/28/09
Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries
Cochrane Reviews, 10/19/09
Article Search
Sponsor